Here’s the article you requested about the KMP algorithm. I’ve broken down this complex topic into several sections to make it easier to understand.

---

Demystifying the KMP Algorithm: A Beginner’s Guide

Have you ever used the “find” feature in a text document? You type in a word or phrase, and almost instantly, it highlights all the occurrences. This seemingly simple action often relies on a powerful and clever algorithm known as the Knuth-Morris-Pratt (KMP) algorithm.

In this guide, we’ll break down the KMP algorithm in a way that’s easy to understand, even if you’re new to computer science concepts. We’ll start by looking at the “naive” way of searching and then dive into how KMP makes this process much more efficient.

The Problem: Inefficient String Searching

Imagine you have a long string of text, and you want to find a specific pattern within it. For example, let’s say our text is “ABABCABABAB” and we’re looking for the pattern “ABAB”.

The most straightforward way to do this is to:

1. Start at the beginning of the text.
2. Compare the text character by character with the pattern.
3. If a character doesn’t match, move one position to the right in the text and start the comparison all over again from the beginning of the pattern.

Let’s walk through this with our example:

1. ABABCABABAB
   ABAB

2. ABABCABABAB
   ABAB (Mismatch)

3. ABABCABABAB
   ABAB (Mismatch)

…and so on.

This method, often called the “brute-force” or “naive” approach, works, but it can be very slow, especially with long texts and patterns. Every time there’s a mismatch, we have to go back and re-check characters we’ve already looked at. This is where the KMP algorithm comes in.

The KMP Solution: Intelligent Searching with a “Longest Proper Prefix” (LPS) Table

The genius of the KMP algorithm lies in its ability to avoid redundant comparisons. It does this by creating a special table called the “Longest Proper Prefix which is also a Suffix” (LPS) table, sometimes referred to as a “failure function.”

Let’s break down what this means:

• Prefix: The beginning part of a string. For “apple,” “a,” “ap,” “app,” and “appl” are prefixes.
• Suffix: The ending part of a string. For “apple,” “e,” “le,” “ple,” and “pple” are suffixes.
• Proper Prefix/Suffix: A prefix or suffix that is not the entire string itself.

The LPS table tells us, for each position in our pattern, the length of the longest proper prefix of the string up to that point that is also a suffix of that same part of the string.

Let’s create the LPS table for our example pattern, “ABAB”:

• A: LPS[0] = 0 (No proper prefix)
• AB: LPS[1] = 0 (No matching prefix and suffix)
• ABA: The longest proper prefix that is also a suffix is “A”. The length is 1. LPS[2] = 1.
• ABAB: The longest proper prefix that is also a suffix is “AB”. The length is 2. LPS[3] = 2.

So, our LPS table for “ABAB” is [0, 0, 1, 2].

How the KMP Algorithm Works

Now, let’s see how the KMP algorithm uses this LPS table to search for our pattern “ABAB” in the text “ABABCABABAB”.

We’ll use two pointers: i for the current position in the text and j for the current position in the pattern.

1. i = 0, j = 0:

   • Text: ABABCABABAB
   • Pattern: ABAB
   • Match! i becomes 1, j becomes 1.

2. i = 1, j = 1:

   • Text: ABABCABABAB
   • Pattern: ABAB
   • Match! i becomes 2, j becomes 2.

3. i = 2, j = 2:

   • Text: ABABCABABAB
   • Pattern: ABAB
   • Match! i becomes 3, j becomes 3.

4. i = 3, j = 3:

   • Text: ABABCABABAB
   • Pattern: ABAB
   • Match! i becomes 4, j becomes 4. We have a match! We’ve found the pattern starting at index 0 of the text.

   Now, instead of starting all over from the next character in the text, we use our LPS table. We look at LPS[j-1], which is LPS[3] = 2. This tells us that the last 2 characters of the part of the pattern we just matched (“AB”) are the same as the first 2 characters of the pattern. So, we can keep our i where it is and just move our j back to 2. This is because we already know that “AB” matches the text at i-2 and i-1.

5. i = 4, j = 2:

   • Text: ABABCABABAB
   • Pattern: AB
   • Mismatch! (C != A). Since j is not 0, we look at LPS[j-1], which is LPS[1] = 0. So, j becomes 0.

6. i = 4, j = 0:

   • Text: ABABCABABAB
   • Pattern: ABAB
   • Mismatch! (C != A). Now j is 0, so we just increment i. i becomes 5.

7. i = 5, j = 0:

   • Text: ABABCABABAB
   • Pattern: ABAB
   • Match! i becomes 6, j becomes 1.

…and so on.

As you can see, by using the LPS table, the KMP algorithm avoids having to re-examine characters in the text that it has already matched. This makes it significantly faster than the naive approach, especially for longer texts and patterns.

Key Takeaway

The KMP algorithm is a clever and efficient way to find a pattern within a text. By pre-processing the pattern to create an LPS table, it avoids unnecessary comparisons and achieves a linear time complexity, making it a valuable tool in computer science and programming.
I hope this explanation helps you understand the KMP algorithm better. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask